USSJed

Alright, not Naruto related... but wtf is a text Wall?

Please answer, then feel free to delete after I have read the answer...

The Green Dragon

__________________
"TGD"

"You know nothing of 'The Crunch'. You've never even been to 'The Crunch'.~"

Lee Chaolan (Tekken 6), Darrius (Mortal Kombat Armageddon), Gattsu (Berserk), Jack-2 (Tekken Tag), Ryuk (Death Note)

[MFG Reputation Guide for Beginners]|[-ORLY?-]|[-YA RLY!-]

USSJed

Thank you

Masked_Felix

I indisputably can't let The Text Wall's misinformation and misguided arguments about authoritarianism go by without comment. Note that some of the facts I plan to use in this letter were provided to me by a highly educated person who managed to escape The Text Wall's phlegmatic indoctrination and is consequently believable. If I were a complete sap, I'd believe The Text Wall's line that two wrongs make a right. Unfortunately for it, I realize that The Text Wall claims that taxpayers are a magic purse that never runs out of gold. I would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another meretricious attempt to discourage us from expressing our tracts in whatever way we darn well please.

One thing is certain: Teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain -- with a straight face -- that public opinion is a reliable indicator of what's true and what isn't. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that if it were up to The Text Wall, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism. When I first encountered The Text Wall's mottos, all I could think of was, "Time has only reinforced that conviction." The Text Wall would feel an intense schadenfreude if its claims made me suffer endless humiliation. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that its madness is the direct consequence of self-hatred, false assumptions about society, and stupidity? Astute observers have known for years that The Text Wall has been trying to raise funds for scientific studies that "prove" that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. This is what's called "advocacy research" or "junk science" because it's funded by materialistic hatemongers who have already decided that The Text Wall is forward-looking, open-minded, and creative.

The Text Wall has written volumes about how its crusades are Holy Writ. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that honest people will admit that it broadens its appeal by seeking influence and adherents in the pessimism movement. Concerned people are not afraid to debate the efficacy of The Text Wall's naive revenge fantasies. And sensible people know that The Text Wall is a faithful student of Sun Tzu, the ancient Chinese strategist who advocated demoralizing one's enemy as the highest art of warfare. In view of that, it is not surprising that The Text Wall refuses to come to terms with reality. It prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination.

The sole point of agreement between myself and brown-nosing propagandists is that when I was a child, my clergyman told me, "It is irresponsible to accept everything at face value." If you think about it you'll see his point. I hate it when people get their facts totally wrong. For instance, whenever I hear some corporate fat cat make noises about how The Text Wall can succeed without trying, I can't help but think that if The Text Wall had done its homework, it'd know that it spews out its vituperative slander from a safe, no-risk forum. I explained the reason for that just a moment ago. If you don't mind, though, I'll go ahead and explain it again. To begin with, if we don't make an impartial and well-informed evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of The Text Wall's ventures, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that The Text Wall has stated that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to its meddlesome prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers. One clear inference from that statement -- an inference that is never really disavowed -- is that materialism is the only alternative to Trotskyism. Now that's just mumpish.
The Text Wall's prevarications are eerily similar to those promoted by madmen such as Pol Pot. What's scary, though, is that their extollment of Lysenkoism has been ratcheted up a few notches from anything Pol Pot ever conjured up. I want to acquire the input of a representative cross-section of the community in a non-threatening, inclusive environment. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé but because life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is The Text Wall so compelled to complain about situations over which it has no control? Personally, I don't believe the answer has anything to do with charlatanism. Rather, I believe it involves The Text Wall's tendency to eat our nation to its bones.

I respect the English language and believe in the use of words as a means of communication. Odious swaggerers like The Text Wall, however, consider spoken communication as merely a set of noises uttered to excite emotions in the worst classes of self-aggrandizing, morally crippled delinquents there are in order to convince them to introduce, cultivate, and encourage moral rot. If an attempt to smear and defame me isn't mischievous, it certainly is shambolic. The Text Wall needs to stop living in denial. It needs to wake up and realize that its screeds are becoming increasingly bookish. They have already begun to eroticize relations of dominance and subordination. Now fast-forward a few years to a time in which they have enabled The Text Wall to twist the teaching of history to suit its blathering purposes. If you don't want such a time to come then help me discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic. Help me insist on a policy of zero tolerance toward barbarism.
The Text Wall maintains that either it has its moral compass in tact or that some people deserve to feel safe while others do not. The Text Wall denies any other possibility. The Text Wall's gofers often reverse the normal process of interpretation. That is, they value the unsaid over the said, the obscure over the clear. This is not to say that the few vulgar idiots who deny this are not only wrong, they are willfully unctuous. It is merely to point out that if The Text Wall had lived the short, sickly, miserable life of a chattel serf in the ages "before technocracy" it wouldn't be so keen to start wars, ruin the environment, invent diseases, and routinely do a hundred other things that kill people. Maybe it'd even begin to realize that by allowing it to address what is, in the end, a nonexistent problem we are selling our souls for dross. Instead, we should be striving to do what comes naturally.

While we all despair over The Text Wall's violent sound bites, we must also remember the principles that will guide our better behaviors and higher aspirations. While I claim that The Text Wall has every right to its thrasonical, irritable opinions, its zealots are tools. Like a hammer or an axe, they are not inherently evil or destructive. The evil is in the force that manipulates them and uses them for destructive purposes. That evil is The Text Wall, who wants nothing less than to destroy everything beautiful and good. Not to belabor the point, but it seems that no one else is telling you that The Text Wall's objectives reflect a footling bias that will brandish the word "chlamydobacteriaceae" (as it is commonly spelled) to hoodwink people into believing that violence and prejudice are funny one of these days. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, The Text Wall speaks like a true defender of the status quo -- a status quo, we should not forget, that enables it to reduce social and cultural awareness to a dictated set of guidelines to follow.
There's a lot of daylight between The Text Wall's views and mine. It believes that macabre mendicants aren't ever deluded while I avouch that people used to think I was exaggerating whenever I said that it is not the case -- notwithstanding what its stentorian propaganda so adamantly proclaims -- that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. After seeing The Text Wall project a stream of insensitive images of death, sex, disaster, material goods, celebrities, and other fixtures in a mock-Olympian firmament these same people now realize that I wasn't exaggerating at all. In fact, they even realize that The Text Wall will promote a herd mentality over principled, individual thought because it possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses pesky clodpolls with deceitful and uncontrollable rage.

The Text Wall is an interesting organization. On the one hand, it likes to do the devil's work. But on the other hand, I have begged its trained seals to step forth and shatter the adage that the ideas of "freedom" and "paternalism" are Siamese twins. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how The Text Wall might retaliate? The answer is obvious if you understand that idle hands are the devil's tools. That's why The Text Wall spends its leisure time devising ever more sullen ways to displace meaningful discussion of an issue's merit or demerit with hunch and emotion. The Text Wall should learn to appreciate what it has instead of feeling so oppressed because it can't do everything it wants, every time it wants to. Let us now address the real issues faced by mankind because in that is our only hope for the future.

I, speaking as someone who is not a debauched, deluded brigand, am going to make this short but sweet: Mr. Uchiha P. Itachi, Sr. uses a litany of euphemisms, buzz words, and doublespeak to help him push our efforts two steps backward. I explained the reason for that just a moment ago. If you don't mind, though, I'll go ahead and explain it again. To begin with, I have one itsy-bitsy problem with Itachi's whinges. Videlicet, they perpetuate misguided and questionable notions of other pathological drongos' intentions. And that's saying nothing about how his purpose is not to enlighten, but to deceive. But it goes further than that; he justifies his malodorous dissertations with fallacious logical arguments based on argumentum ad baculum. In case you're unfamiliar with the term, it means that if we don't accept Itachi's claim that lackadaisical stool pigeons should be fêted at wine-and-cheese fund-raisers then he will seize control over where we eat, sleep, socialize, and associate with others. For practical reasons, I have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say.

The first lies that Itachi told us were relatively benign. Still, they have been progressing. And they will continue to progress until there is no more truth; his lies will grow until they blot out the sun.

So, Itachi, maybe the problem is not with passive-aggressive cozeners, but with you. He likes thinking thoughts that aren't burdensome and that feel good. That's why Itachi has a knack for convincing bestial thugs that he does the things he does "for the children". That's called marketing. The underlying trick is to use sesquipedalian terms like "calcareoargillaceous" and "isomerizeparabolization" to keep his sales pitch from sounding pharisaical. That's why you really have to look hard to see that if Itachi is incapable of discerning the mad ramblings of thrasonical cheapskates from the wisdom and nuance embedded in a sage's discourse then I seriously doubt that he'll be capable of determining that there is a format he should follow for his next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts.

I have a plan to make a cause célèbre out of exposing Itachi's traducements for what they really are. I call this plan "Operation ask Itachi to rephrase his criticisms in a more reasoned way". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that when one looks at the increasing influence of particularism in our culture one sees that Itachi's signature is on everything. So how come his fingerprints are nowhere to be found? The answer has two parts to it. The first part regards the manner in which I find it ironic that Itachi calls me libidinous when he's the most libidinous person you'll ever see. The second part of the answer is focused on the the way that if Itachi were as bright as he thinks he is, he'd know that he says that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. But then he turns around and says that all literature that opposes exclusionism was forged by combative nose-in-the-air snobs. You know, you can't have it both ways, Itachi.
If you were to tell Itachi that his demands reflect several layers of moral concern for many religions, he'd just pull his security blanket a little tighter around himself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. I would like to put forth the possibility that he is entirely mistaken if he believes that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. I don't mean to throw fuel on an already considerable fire, but now is the time to redefine the rhetoric and make room for meaningful discussion. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if Itachi finds a way to muddy the word "teleoroentgenography".

If nothing else, Itachi has two imperatives. The first is to poke and pry into every facet of our lives. The second imperative is to perpetuate the nonsense known technically as the analytic/synthetic dichotomy.

To believe that Itachi is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong is to deceive ourselves. His idolators consider his anecdotes a breath of fresh air. I, however, find them more like the fetid odor of militarism. Itachi's supporters have tried repeatedly to assure me that Itachi will eventually tire of his plan to spit in the face of propriety and will then step aside and let us develop a rational-empirical base for dialogue about his op-ed pieces. When that will happen is unclear -- probably sometime between "don't hold your breath" and "beware of flying pigs". When you reflect upon this, you'll realize that there are lots of weepy, wimpy flower children out there who are always whining that I'm being too harsh in my criticisms of Itachi. I wish such people would wake up and realize that Itachi has long wanted to prevent anyone from stating publicly that the people with the smallest minds always have the biggest mouths. Why do I bring that up? Because by studying his repression of ideas in its extreme, unambiguous form one may more clearly understand why Itachi is bound to have a rude awakening when he finally realizes how few people approve of his mindless biases. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that it seems clear that we can't just sit around and do nothing. But we ought to look at the matter in a broader framework before we draw final conclusions on the subject: We see that this is a free country, and I profess we ought to keep it that way.

By this, I mean that Itachi's fabulous success is not firmly connected with meritorious ability. Let me recap that for you because it really is extraordinarily important: Itachi keeps insisting that he possesses infinite wisdom. To me, there is something fundamentally wrong with that story. Maybe it's that if my own experience has taught me anything, it's that inasmuch as I disagree with Itachi's accusations and find his ad hominem attacks offensive, I am happy to meet Itachi's speech with more speech and, if necessary, continue this discussion until the truth shines. I laughed so hard I almost cried when Itachi stated publicly that every word that leaves his mouth is teeming with useful information. You just can't make this stuff up -- at least, not without noticing that it strikes me as amusing that Itachi complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! He does nothing but complain.

Itachi wants all of us to believe that courtesy and manners don't count for anything. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. His equivocations are merely childish attempts at ridicule. History offers innumerable examples for the truth of this assertion. Even so, I can't possibly believe his claim that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. If someone can convince me otherwise, I'll eat my hat. Heck, I'll eat a whole closetful of hats. That's a pretty safe bet because I respect the English language and believe in the use of words as a means of communication. Evil, brain-damaged good-for-nothings like Itachi, however, consider spoken communication as merely a set of noises uttered to excite emotions in the most complacent thieves you'll ever see in order to convince them to fund a vast web of logorrheic heretics, frightful pseudo-intellectuals, and irresponsible propagandists.

To bring the matter closer to home, let me remind you that Itachi's hariolations are continually evolving into more and more self-indulgent incarnations. Here, I'm not just talking about evolution in a simply Darwinist sense; I'm also talking about how Itachi's retorts to criticism are so rehearsed that he may be almost unconscious of what he's saying, as one is when one utters the responses in church. There's nothing controversial about that view. It's a fact, pure and simple. It was a fact long before anyone realized that Itachi is trying hard to convince a substantial number of incontinent, scabrous freaks to intensify race hatred. He presumably believes that the "hundredth-monkey phenomenon" will spontaneously incite yawping schizophrenics to behave likewise. The reality, however, is that Itachi should start developing the parts of his brain that have been impaired by prætorianism. At least then he'll stop trying to subvert time-tested societal norms. I have now said everything there is to say. So, to summarize it all, double standards are always ungrateful.

Once again, I find disappointment. Once again, I find no satisfaction. Once again, I find that opposing Mrs. Haruno 'Useless" Sakura's lethargic theatrics actively and earnestly is the moral duty of every good human being. Perhaps before going on, I should describe Sakura to you. Sakura is feebleminded, brutish, and filthy. Furthermore, she yearns to obstruct important things.

Sakura's testy hariolations have caused chthonic cozeners to descend upon us like a swarm of locusts, turning dummkopfs loose against us good citizens. From what I understand, Sakura has never gotten ahead because of her hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of Sakura's successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue.

Does Sakura honestly expect us to believe that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs? It is bootless to speculate on the matter but it should be noted that if Sakura can't cite the basis for her claim that black is white and night is day then she should just shut up about it. She maintains that embracing a system of racialism will make everything right with the world. This is hardly the case. Rather, there is growing evidence that says, to the contrary, that when a friend wants to drive inebriated, you try to stop him. Well, Sakura is drunk with power, which is why we must shine a light on her efforts to declare that she holds a universal license that allows her to blacklist her enemies as terrorist sympathizers or traitors.

Sakura's adulators profess that Sakura is cunctipotent. This is precisely the non-equation that Sakura is trying to patch together. What she's missing, as usual, is that her sophistries do not represent progress. They represent insanity masquerading as progress. She is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, Sakura's willingness to bring widespread death and degradation to millions of human beings across the face of the Earth sets a new world record for brazenness. Sakura has called people like me maladroit meatheads, baleful drongos, and revolting mouthpieces for ignominious, disgraceful pharisaism so many times that these accusations no longer have any sting. Sakura unmistakably continues to employ such insults because she's run out of logical arguments. I suppose an alternate explanation is that Sakura refuses to come to terms with reality. She prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination.
Sakura divides the organization of her intolerant, picayunish communications into two halves that, apparently separate from one another, in truth, form an inseparable whole. The first half seeks to erase the memory of all traditions and all history, while the second half is yet another uninformed, noisome blend of batty conformism and impetuous defeatism. If I didn't think she would cause the destruction of human ambition and joy, I wouldn't say that cynicism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other "ism". That's why it's Sakura's favorite; it makes it easy for her to sugarcoat the past and dispense false optimism for the future.

Sakura is like a giant octopus sprawling its slimy length over city, state, and nation. Like the octopus of real life, she operates under cover of self-created screen. Sakura seizes in her long and powerful tentacles our executive officers, our legislative bodies, our schools, our courts, our newspapers, and every agency created for the public protection. Let no one say that her reinterpretations of historic events are Right with a capital R. No, this is dim-witted separatism and must be regarded as an attempt to impinge upon our daily lives. Throughout human history, crude, flippant hedonists have always been conniving. So it should come as no surprise that my general thesis is that experience shows that her remonstrations are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. More than that, she twists every argument into some sort of "struggle" between two parties. Sakura unvaryingly constitutes the underdog party, which is what she claims gives her the right to engage in an endless round of finger pointing. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: There is a format she should follow for her next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts.

My real point here is that it seems clear that Sakura's zingers rub me the wrong way. But we ought to look at the matter in a broader framework before we draw final conclusions on the subject: We see that Sakura has the nerve to call those of us who uplift individuals and communities on a global scale to put to rest the animosities that have kept various groups of people from enjoying anything other than superficial unity "conspiracy theorists". No, we're "conspiracy revealers" because we reveal that the impact of Sakura's juvenile excuses is exactly that predicted by the Book of Revelation. Evil will preside over the land. Injustice will triumph over justice, chaos over order, futility over purpose, superstition over reason, and lies over truth. Only when humanity experiences this Hell on Earth will it fully appreciate that Sakura might have been in a lethargic state of autointoxication when she said that incomprehensible scumbags aren't ever short-sighted. More likely, perhaps, is that when Sakura says that those who disagree with her should be cast into the outer darkness, should be shunned, should starve, that's just a load of spucatum tauri.

Sakura wants to make conditions far worse than could ever have been the case without her viperine efforts. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. Not only have the most ultra-duplicitous ideologues I've ever seen decided to glorify their anecdotes by dressing them up as moral and righteous prerogatives but their vaporings are being debated as though they were actually reasonable.

Sakura's drones get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with Sakura, and meeting some other yawping leeches is merely a social event. They're not even aware that Sakura finds reality too difficult to swallow. Or maybe it just gets lost between the sports and entertainment pages. In either case, as that last sentence suggests, I myself strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but Sakura's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that one of the goals of simplism is to render meaningless the words "best" and "worst". Sakura admires that philosophy because, by annihilating human perceptions of quality, Sakura's own mediocrity can flourish.

If, today, the urge of Sakura's war-soul can prompt her to make our country spiritually blind, then imagine, if you can, how that same soul will express itself through the thousandfold-more-domineering Sakura of tomorrow. I would like nothing more than to set the record straight, but I won't linger on that. I despise everything about her. I despise her attempts to precipitate riots. I despise how she insists that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd. Most of all, I despise her complete obliviousness to the fact that it's best to ignore most of the quotes that she so frequently cites. Sakura takes quotes of of context; uses misleading, irrelevant, and out-of-date quotes; and, presents quotes from legitimate authorities used misleadingly to support contentions that they did not intend and that are not true. In short, anyone -- you or I or a Martian just arrived in a flying saucer -- who wants to call for proper disciplinary action against her and her torchbearers should realize that we must show her that we are not powerless pedestrians on the asphalt of life. We must show Sakura that we can extirpate fascism root, trunk, and branch. Maybe then Sakura will realize that she doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. She uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. Let me end by saying that I know that what I have written in this letter will send many readers (especially any who are big fans of Mrs. Haruno 'Useless" Sakura) into a tizzy or a tantrum. I am sorry, but I remind them that we will need to use diverse skills and tactics if we are to point out that the emperor has no clothes on.

I have some very startling, very radical -- some might say hopeless -- insights into Dr. Hoshigaki F. Kisame's latest plaints. And that's why I feel compelled to say something about contemptible, discourteous nutcases. Now, I'm going to be honest here. If Dr. Kisame is incapable of discerning the mad ramblings of biased, otiose leeches from the wisdom and nuance embedded in a sage's discourse then I seriously doubt that he'll be capable of determining that his libidinous dream is starting to come true. Liberties are being killed by attrition. Colonialism is being installed by accretion. The only way that we can reverse these batty, overweening trends is to call for proper disciplinary action against Dr. Kisame and his encomiasts. To be precise, in asserting that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune, Dr. Kisame demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision.

When all discoverable facts and experience fly in the face of Dr. Kisame's dour world view, Dr. Kisame stubbornly holds onto his ignorance as his birthright. There's no need here to present any evidence of that; examples can be found all over the World Wide Web. In fact, a simple search will quickly reveal that Dr. Kisame has remarked that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt condemn children to a life of drugs, gangs, drinking, rape, incest, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and a number of other horrors". This is a comment that should chill the spine of anyone with moral convictions. To make sure you understand I'll spell it out for you. For starters, Dr. Kisame would have us believe that there should be publicly financed centers of gnosticism. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Dr. Kisame is surrounded by rude lotharios who parrot the same nonsense, which is why there isn't a man, woman, or child alive today who thinks that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose, so let's toss out that ridiculous argument of Dr. Kisame's from the get-go.

I am shocked and angered by Dr. Kisame's phlegmatic, cold-blooded improprieties. Such shameful conduct should never be repeated. Dr. Kisame, you are welcome to get off my back this time and stay off.

I can certainly suggest how Dr. Kisame ought to behave. Ultimately, however, the burden of acting with moral rectitude lies with Dr. Kisame himself. How can we trust a venom-spouting politico who actively conceals his true intentions? We can't. And besides, prudence is no vice. Cowardice -- especially his disingenuous form of it -- is. Doesn't Dr. Kisame realize that his mercenaries hew closer to the party line -- to Dr. Kisame's established body of cant -- than do most other smarmy barmpots? Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: It is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by Dr. Kisame's contumelious manuscripts. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and expand people's understanding of Dr. Kisame's self-aggrandizing litanies.

Although Dr. Kisame has unfairly depicted me and those who share my beliefs as schizophrenics and prima donnas, we are neither. Yes, a deranged spirit is precisely the wrong spirit in which to attack his malice and hypocrisy, but we have a choice. Either we let ourselves be led like lambs to the slaughter by Dr. Kisame and his intimates or we lend a helping hand. While I don't expect you to have much trouble making up your mind you should nevertheless consider that our national media is controlled by haughty New Age clunks (especially the parasitic type). That's why you probably haven't heard that Dr. Kisame sees no reason why he shouldn't give expression to that which is most destructive and most harmful to society. It is only through an enlightened, outraged citizenry that such moral turpitude, corruption, and degradation of the law can be brought to a halt. So, let me enlighten and outrage you by stating that we can't stop Dr. Kisame overnight. It takes time, patience and experience to listen to others.

Let's all keep our fingers crossed that Dr. Kisame doesn't construct the spectre of a terrible armed threat. I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that he is up to, the more shocking things, things like how he wants to canonize ethically bankrupt, silly dunderheads as nomological emblems of propriety. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but he is addicted to the feeling of power, to the idea of controlling people. Sadly, he has no real concern for the welfare or the destiny of the people he desires to lead.

In all fairness, there are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent Dr. Kisame has tried to blame our societal problems on handy scapegoats. The other is whether or not Dr. Kisame's vituperations are brutish, poisonous to young minds, and disrespectful to Western values and achievements. I could write pages on the subject, but the following should suffice. Dr. Kisame attempts to sound intelligent by cramming as many big words into a sentence as possible, whether they are used correctly or not. I trust that I have not shocked any of you by writing that. However, I do realize that some of my readers may feel that much of what I have penned about Dr. Kisame in this letter is heartless and in violation of our Christian duty to love everyone. If so, I can say only that Dr. Kisame's methods are much subtler now than ever before. Dr. Kisame is more adept at hidden mind control and his techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized.

Only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that Dr. Kisame's precepts cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. No one likes being attacked by the most sadistic chuckleheads I've ever seen. Even worse, Dr. Kisame exploits our fear of those attacks -- which he claims will evolve faster than you can say "sphygmomanometric" into biological, chemical, or nuclear attacks -- as a pretext to revive an arcadian past that never existed. If you think that's scary, then you should remember that if you don't think that I find it ironic that Dr. Kisame calls me postmodernist when he's the most postmodernist person you'll ever see, then you've missed the whole point of this letter.

Plainly stated, Dr. Kisame has been doing "in-depth research" (whatever he thinks that means) to prove that he has the mandate of Heaven to fuel the censorship-and-intolerance crowd. I should mention that I've been doing some research of my own. So far, I've "discovered" that Dr. Kisame's crass game of chess -- the feebleminded chess of Lysenkoism -- has continued for far too long. It's time to checkmate this snivelling boor and show him that we can no longer afford to do nothing about his inerudite theatrics. Instead, we must strike while the iron is hot and ensure that the values for which we have labored and for which many of us have fought and sacrificed will continue in ascendancy. To get even the simplest message into the consciousness of perfidious rotters it has to be repeated at least fifty times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following fifty times, but we find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. This belief is due to a basic confusion that can be cleared up simply by stating that Dr. Kisame's subliminal psywar campaigns have kept us separated for too long from the love, contributions, and challenges of our brothers and sisters in this wonderful adventure we share together -- life!

Without beating around the bush, I'll tell you now what I have concluded about Dr. Kisame's savage artifices. I've concluded that I don't want to build castles in the air. I don't want to plan things that I can't yet implement. But I do want to nourish children with good morals and self-esteem because doing so clearly demonstrates how he wants us to feel sorry for the venal, stingy losers who give me reason to hide in a closet. I insist we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that that fact is simply inescapable to any thinking man or woman. "Thinking" is the key word in the previous sentence. Dr. Hoshigaki F. Kisame's thralls must mend their ways. And that's all I have to say.


















That, dear friends, is a Text Wall argument. Combat those points. I dare you.

Madness

Quoting simply for the pure joy of it

Win.

__________________

The Green Dragon