![]() |
|
|
#121 (permalink) | |
|
Commander Madness
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Seeing how long I can make this entry, simply for lol reasons. Maybe I can make it stretch to the o-
Posts: 9,136
Blog Entries: 9
Rep Power: 165
|
Quote:
Oh and, you can see things at lightspeed. Things would just... lag.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#122 (permalink) | |
|
(23) Final Warrior
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bitch, I live in a FUCKING TRASH-CAN. Of course I'm a grouch!
Posts: 2,836
Rep Power: 26
|
Quote:
^Missing the point. They are ALL scientifically innacurate. Toriyama apparently knew about things like gravity and breathing in space and looked them up (he wouldn't know someone on a heavier planet would weigh less or that you can't breath). There are even more examples than that. Stop saying what is "impossible" when in fact, even outside the manga, Lustoid brilliantly pointed out that there are speeds faster than light. And your last sentence just helped my case... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 (permalink) |
|
(22) Super Saiyan 3
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: I go with the naked ladies[;)]
Posts: 2,139
Blog Entries: 4
Rep Power: 51
|
When you see stars, you think they're in the location you see them to be. Truth is, they are off by a few light years
__________________
Nobody's perfect and since I'm nobody...
Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else. Avoid fruits and nuts. You are what you eat. Jim Davis All true wisdom is found on T-shirts. Right now I'm having amnesia and deja vu at the same time. I think I've forgotten this before. |
|
|
|
|
|
#124 (permalink) | |
|
(13) Great Ape
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 272
Rep Power: 2
|
You'd be able to see things, just that you'd see them AFTER you hit them. Lightspeed has never been stated canonically to be possible so there's no reason to assume that it's true. It's never been stated to be canonically possible for a guy to give birth to a baby, but I bet if I said that you'd go "Lol Goku's a man, that's not possible".
Sorata, it doesn't matter if ki surpasses the speed of light, because neural pathways cannot operate beyond lightspeed anyway. The time it takes for a signal to get from a sensory organ (skin, eyes, ears) to the brain and for the brain to process it is going to always be below light speed, so that even when you 'sense' chi, it's going to take longer than lightspeed for you to realise you are sensing chi and what exactly it means. By the way, maths prove nothing without a theoretical basis. I mean, you could come up with a formula that states any mathematical possibility that would work on paper but cannot work in real life once you account for the physical factors. Also, you've failed to acknowledge that the range is currently between 106 miles in a second and 192,000 miles in a second, which is a massive, massive difference. You've already decided at the very start of the thread that Gotenks was moving at the absolute upper limit and refuse to accept anything that would drop that speed below lightspeed, not due to any scientific, biological or strucurally logically sound reasons, but merely because it would harm your argument. And finally, when you prove a quote that shows that eyes do not require light despite being light-based sensory organs, then I'll shut up about that. But you can't. And you never proved that the Death beam moves beyond the speed of light, merely that it moves faster than Piccolo and Krillin's action reflex nerve impulses were at the time, and they're far below light speed, so that means bugger all. You could be twice an action reflex impulse in speed and still not be even 1% the speed of light. You act like a human's eye can see at the threshold of lightspeed, whent his is simply not true. The brain only catalogs less than 24 images from the eye ever second, hence why 24 frame-per-second animations appear to have full movement to us. Cameras can film at far higher rates, into the hundreds of frames per second, but they still cannot see at light speed. If you could, you know what you'd see? You'd see each individual photon of light anyway, and given their mass soaking effects and the fact that we view them in waves, if you could see at lightspeed you still wouldn't see anything but massive clusters of photons. I've studied psychoneurology, I know how long it takes a signal to get tot he brain and have meaning made of it, and it's far below light speed. Quote:
Also, I did point out that you can achieve speeds faster than light, but only as a state of pure energy, which Gotenks is not. So it didn't help your argument, but only crippled it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 (permalink) | |
|
Commander Madness
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Seeing how long I can make this entry, simply for lol reasons. Maybe I can make it stretch to the o-
Posts: 9,136
Blog Entries: 9
Rep Power: 165
|
Quote:
And there are speeds faster than light... by about a fraction. And it's only done by radiation particles, which are basically light anyway. So the only thing faster than light is... light. Anyway, I don't see how the lag would help your case. People would seem to be there whilst not being there. In order to hit someone going at the speed of light you'd have to punch ahead of where you saw them. And seeing as they're going at the speed of light, it's gonna be a fair amount in front of them. And seeing as light can circle the globe 8 times in a second... that's one hell of a lead, especially if they're going several times faster than light. I'm not going to get into the details about the nuclear explosions going faster than light would cause either. Simply moving the atoms out of the way that fast would trigger huge amounts of nuclear reactions, even in space. Credit for the info from my friend btw ![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#126 (permalink) |
|
(23) Final Warrior
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bitch, I live in a FUCKING TRASH-CAN. Of course I'm a grouch!
Posts: 2,836
Rep Power: 26
|
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
And I'm willing to accept other ranges of speed. YOUR the ones who absolutely refuse to accept mathematically proven calculations. Your the ones who act like every single aspect of physics can be implemented into Dragonball. You're the bigots. It IS possible that he travelled at speeds faster than light and nothing you say can change that. Regarding the death beam, you once again are ignoreing the fact their perception depends ENTIRELY on their strength. Entirely. And they already could not be tracked with human eyes when their power-levels were in the hundreds. They were absolute blurs to ordinary people and all they heard was a "crack". |
|
|
|
|
|
#127 (permalink) | |
|
(15) Super Namekian
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 461
Rep Power: 5
|
Quote:
If youre talking about neural reactions it would be impossible for them to even achieve early millions cause their brains couldn't react with the speed needed to punch or avoid. It would mean that their top speed is the speed of the electricity in neural system and when they reach it they just can't be faster. Yet their reaction speed depends only from the amount of their power. DBZ characters brains are proven to react and process information hundreds times faster than any normal human brain. To make things clear - I think they couldn't achieve lightspeed but not because of their senses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#128 (permalink) | |||
|
(26) Great Elder of Namek
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Surrounded by dickgirls
Posts: 5,325
Rep Power: 126
|
Quote:
Why are you assuming that something has to travel the speed of light to be invisible to the human eye? I don't know that that is true. Can you back that up? And what about the Death Beam? Quote:
Capsule technology could be very possible in the future. Only alien characters regenerate, such as Piccolo. And his species is supposed to be based on lizards and whatnot. They can regenerate lost limbs. Breathing in space (it's not actually breathing, I think, more that Freeza doesn't need to breathe, or that he can hold his breath. It's not explained) is done by an alien character, and surviving in higher gravity is also done by aliens. Teleporting and wish granting are both fantasy elements that work within the Dragon Ball universe. Quote:
You have a theory, not a fact. That's all.
__________________
"Words don't exist so that we can tell the truth; they exist so that we can conceal the truth" - ZOMBIEPOWDER. Volume 02 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#129 (permalink) | ||
|
Commander Madness
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Seeing how long I can make this entry, simply for lol reasons. Maybe I can make it stretch to the o-
Posts: 9,136
Blog Entries: 9
Rep Power: 165
|
You stole that from me
![]() And I've since found out I was wrong. In a fictional universe what we don't see is a debatable truth. And we take it as our own universe anything that isn't stated otherwise. Lightspeed is one of these. Noone could breach it. Quote:
I like the "I have green goblins lived up my chimney and you can't prove me wrong!" method of debating. It's right up there with covering your ears and saying "Lalalalalalalala!" in the childishness stakes. Well done ANB. I thought you were better than that. Quote:
Well it would catch them, but they won't be there. Think of it as having a bad ping in real life.
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#130 (permalink) |
|
(13) Great Ape
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 272
Rep Power: 2
|
Sorry ANB, but the topic title already counters your point just then. You'd already decided, through no actual scientific method and evidence, and won't accept speeds below lightspeed. This is different to us not accepting beyond lightspeed, because below lightspeed is already proven to be possible and beyond lightspeed is not. So as such, by not accepting something that is already proven as possible, you become the bigot.
I think that through senses they could theoretically push to the very limit of lightspeed, like 99.9999999% the speed of light, but since scientific evidence so far indicates nothing about matter being able to move beyond lightspeed, I can't accept that the neural pathways can do so. So what does this mean for the death beam? Yeah, they'd see it, as long as it goes even a fraction below light speed, but beyond that no. And if they could see beyond light speed, they'd see all the individual photons either frozen or moving so slowly that it'd be like being in a blizzard, which would render you blind anyway. So they still wouldn't see the death beam, cause the light still has to reach them to be able to be seen. As for ANB, when absence of evidence is all you have, that's all you can rely on. Why is this fact so hard to grasp? You wouldn't accept that I have an intangible invisible immesurable pink dragon in my garage, despite the fact that apparently "absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence". So I see no reason I should believe you. Your theory lacks falsifiability, and as such isn't a sound theory, since it can never be proven wrong absolutely, cause you can always just say "absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence". Which goes against scientific methodology and debatable logic, meaning it's pointless to argue the topic with you when you'll just weasel your way out with that statement, every time. And as for the death beam, I'm not ignoring that perception depends on strength. I fully believe the reflexes and perspective speed increases as you grow stronger. But I don't think that there's physically no limit to this capacity, and if there's a physical biological limit of any form, it's going to be the speed of light, because matter and information cannot surpass that speed, as scientifically proven. Look, when scientific evidence emerges that matter can surpass the speed of light, then I'll accept that the theory has some merit. I still won't say it confirms it, since I've already proven he could be going as slow as 106 miles per second, but I'll accept that it becomes plausible once you have actual evidence of some form to back you up. In a debate you can only ever debate with what is known, never what is unknown. |
|
|
|
|
|
#131 (permalink) | |
|
(23) Final Warrior
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bitch, I live in a FUCKING TRASH-CAN. Of course I'm a grouch!
Posts: 2,836
Rep Power: 26
|
Quote:
2-Okay then, stfu about what is "impossible". Toriyama never denies that they go past light speed; therefore you cannot argue it impossible. It's a mathematical possibility. 3-I KNOW THAT THERE ARE "UNCERTAINTIES". There are known knowns and known unkowns. Then there are unkown knowns and unkown unkowns, things you don't know that you don't know! -How long he flew -How long was the nap Are known unkowns. -That he circles it at least 24 times -That it was within the period of 28 minutes Are "knowns". Viz is the official translation company for Dragonball. To bring anything into the debate stemming from a deffering translation is both illegal and unacceptable to the rules on the forums. I am NOT denying that you know Japanese or that they have the word "dozen". So...for the sake of arguement, let's say we DON'T know how many times he flew: -That would mean he flew so fast and so many times he couldn't keep track. -That would mean he flew an unkown number of times -That would mean his speed is considerable We hear Piccolo mention that they only have two minutes before the fusion cancels. Consider this: Gotenks had not been keeping track of the time and forgot that he only had thirty minutes. In fact, he once again negelcts to keep track of time during his rematch with Boo. In his perspective, a thirty minute nap would not have been fatal. And even thinking outside the box: IF Gotenks really flew around so many times he lost count, that could imply as you famously tout that he was flying the entire time and took a one minute nap. Which strongly supports the notion he was at light-speed even more than the viz translation. But I digress. No other translation can be used. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 (permalink) | |
|
Commander Madness
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Seeing how long I can make this entry, simply for lol reasons. Maybe I can make it stretch to the o-
Posts: 9,136
Blog Entries: 9
Rep Power: 165
|
Quote:
![]() Me and Lustoid were ignored! At least ANB's stopped covering his ears anyway.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#133 (permalink) |
|
(23) Final Warrior
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bitch, I live in a FUCKING TRASH-CAN. Of course I'm a grouch!
Posts: 2,836
Rep Power: 26
|
I can't fight all of you at the same time--that would require using my full-power which would obliterate MFG. Anyway, you guys cannot deny the possibility simply because it's "impossible". Do you know what "possibility" means...? There are many things impossible in DBZ. To refute a theory based only on this is flawed logic as it relies on a mind-set which goes against well-established facts in the manga. IN OTHER WORDS: You can't deny the possibility (Which IS there wether you like it or not) simply because it is "scien |