![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| DragonBall GT / Movies Your source for the non-canon events of the movies and GT as told by Toei. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
(21) Majin Warrior
|
I just wanna know what the hell happened to the Saiyans tails after awhile. Is it ever mentioned or talked about?
Gohan has a tail Goten has no tail Trunks has no tail Bulla has no tail Pan has no tail One half breed has a tail, and the others are immune? lol. Pan is 1/3 Saiyan, but you get what I'm saying. I'm not complaining, it's just weird. Thoughts or answers..... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
(18) Artificial Human
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Behind you with a knife
Posts: 801
Rep Power: 8
|
I also thought about that and posted a thread about it.
When a saiyan reaches a certain adult size, their tails do not grow back. I dunno about Trunks and Goten....maybe they were removed because Bulma and Chi-chi didn't want it or something? Gohan's tail was cut not completely removed, so it grew back. Vegeta's was also cut off, but he was already too old. Also the tail does not go away when one becomes a SSJ. Remember Vegeta in Ginyu saga saying that the first and only SSJ could only acheive it using his transformed state and in the flashback, it had a tail.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
(20) Super Saiyan 2
|
Quote:
Simple answer, Toriyama forgot to draw the tails. We could all assume an in-universe answer like Chi Chi and Bulma had them removed.
__________________ Formerly the member demonkingpiccolo "Let's put a SMILE on that face!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
(21) Majin Warrior
|
Not sure about Gohan or Vegeta, but when Bulma got pregnant Vegeta had already unlocked the power of Super Saiyan, I mean Kakarrot had when he knocked up Chichi, so maybe with them two the SS genes within kakarrot and vegeta had been awakened so the tail was useless...
__________________
"Yes it has been too long, now I am back and better than ever!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
(15) Super Namekian
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Watertown, WI
Posts: 468
Rep Power: 4
|
Toriyama didnt need them for the story anymore. First Oozaru was the strongest of the saiyans. Then the Super Saiyan Jin. Plus its more easier to draw a Super Saiyan than an Oozaru. I hate it when people need to find answers for things that dont need an answer. But i find it interesting in what you guys come up with. And i understand that you guys are just wondering. ^. -
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
(21) Majin Warrior
|
I don't know why the others don't have tails, but like you guys had said, it might be that Bulma and Chichi removed them early on. Also, tails don't grow back after reaching maturity. They would only grow back in childhood, since the body has yet to reach its final stage. This is why Goku's tail grows back twice (I believe) in Dragonball, but doesn't grow back after.
Oh, and when does Gohan's tail get removed? It was on Earth, right? When Vegeta fought Oozaru Gohan, who cut off Gohan's tail?
__________________
![]() "Ha, what a fragile breed of people."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
(15) Super Namekian
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Watertown, WI
Posts: 468
Rep Power: 4
|
Vegeta did with an Energy Disc. But if "the tails dont grow back after reaching maturity" thing is true, then why didnt Son Gohans tail grow back? What was he somewhere around 4 right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Shit Poster
|
My take on the sayin tails has always been that they can only be removed permanently through surgery. The bulk of my proof comes from back in Dragonball when Goku tell the gang that Kami surgically removed his tail ("to restore the moon") After this goku's tail no longer grows back. Other facts that support my theory are:
1) After the Goku learns what a tail's main function is, he and gohan are in a hospital. I believe that the "roots" of gohan's tail are surgically removed here. 2) Vegeta when asked about his tail by the doctor on planet Freiza tells him that "...It will grow back." These three facts are all the solid proof for my theory that I can give. My idea about what happened to each of the sayin's tails after this is: Goku - removed by Kami Gohan - removed by surgical doctor after sayin saga Vegeta - as not enough time passes during the namak saga, Vegeta's tail does not grow back. It can be assumed that Bulma had him have it removed during the time skip. Trunks - removed at birth Goten - removed at birth Bra - removed at birth Pan - either not enough sayin blood to grow tail or removed at birth
__________________
9 out of 10 MFGers think that Orancello is SSJJason. If you are one of the 1 in 10 that don't, copy this and put it in your sig. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
(24) Super Saiyan 4
|
I think the tail could have been only a trait to full blood Saiyans and part saiyans like say 1/2 saiyan and 1/2 human. Goten were only 1/4 saiyan maybe the tail trait isnt passed there and pan and bra were a even smaller fraction of saiyan. As for trunks he probably had his tail removed.
__________________
row row fight da power!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |||
|
(20) Super Saiyan 2
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________ Formerly the member demonkingpiccolo "Let's put a SMILE on that face!" |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
(22) Super Saiyan 3
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,963
Rep Power: 11
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|