Another Dragon Ball Z movie? - Page 2

Gangsta SabZ · 09-30-2005

QUOTE(Teen Goten @ Sep 30 2005, 03:12 PM)
I hope that if they were going to make another DBZ movie it would take place after DBZ & the begininning of DBGT.

[snapback]471681[/snapback]

It is very unlikely they'll make another. The only hope is they do it for the anniversary thingie

Akatsuki_Encore · 10-01-2005

If Toriyama writes the storyline and prevents the story from beeing ruined, I'd say yes, at once.

.Godo · 10-01-2005

QUOTE(nyqua @ Sep 29 2005, 09:28 PM)
The rights to dragonball are AT's. AT also has to give permission for someone to use his work. TOEI does not have the rights to dragonball, or else they would not give AT credit for creating dragonball during the credits.

[snapback]471292[/snapback]

Agreed. TOEI has done nothing special with DBZ, they only have animated it, put on some music and made worthless fillers.
It is like saying that Isaac Asimov have sold his book "I robot" to the film company that made the movie when the movie was made. He only gave the movie company rights to the movie, not to his whole friggin work.

On topic: Yes, but not about DBGT, only DB or DBZ, and if Toriyama want to.

.Future_Trunks · 10-01-2005

QUOTE(godho @ Sep 30 2005, 04:18 PM)
QUOTE(nyqua @ Sep 29 2005, 09:28 PM)
The rights to dragonball are AT's. AT also has to give permission for someone to use his work. TOEI does not have the rights to dragonball, or else they would not give AT credit for creating dragonball during the credits.

[snapback]471292[/snapback]

Agreed. TOEI has done nothing special with DBZ, they only have animated it, put on some music and made worthless fillers.
It is like saying that Isaac Asimov have sold his book "I robot" to the film company that made the movie when the movie was made. He only gave the movie company rights to the movie, not to his whole friggin work.

On topic: Yes, but not about DBGT, only DB or DBZ, and if Toriyama want to.

[snapback]471704[/snapback]

OMFG!?!?!?!?

AT does not have the rights to the dragonabll anime

he is the original creator and thats that!!! and no.. they don't say the rights belong to AT..they say rights of toeianimation..

however in the manga they do say the rights belong to AT.

jeez none of you guys own any dragonball vhs or dvd? look in the back it says rights toeianimation.

.Godo · 10-01-2005

Dear, dear Future_Trunks.
YOU. DON'T. GET. IT. DO. YOU? READ. THE. F***ING. LINES. THAT. SOME. PEOPLE. ARE. WRITING. OK?

For the last time, AKIRA TORIYAMA DECIDES WHAT THAT SOULD HAPPEN TO HIS WORK, HE HAS NOT SOLD IT!

Wise words from Nuyqua: The rights to dragonball are AT's. AT also has to give permission for someone to use his work. TOEI does not have the rights to dragonball, or else they would not give AT credit for creating dragonball during the credits.

Let me take the example again: It is like saying that Isaac Asimov have sold his book "I robot" to the film company that made the movie when the movie was made. He only gave the movie company rights to the movie, not to his whole friggin work to manipulate it as they want to.

How can you not decide what that should be done in something that bases on whole friggin work.

The manga=the base of the anime=Toriyama decides. It is HIS original story.

.Future_Trunks · 10-01-2005

QUOTE
For the last time, AKIRA TORIYAMA DECIDES WHAT THAT SOULD HAPPEN TO HIS WORK, HE HAS NOT SOLD IT!

lool.. you see thats the problem right there.. AT did sell his idea thats why he got rich off of it and thats why dragonball turned into an anime..

now the manga was selling greatly in japan..so toei decided to make an anime based on that manga.. AT had nothing to do with the anime..he did not make it..it was this guy... (Daisuke Nishio)

daisuke nishio made dragonball, dragonabllZ and DBGT ANIME..AT did not make db/Z/GT ANIME..why you ask? because he SOLD HIS IDEA TO TOEI!

QUOTE
Wise words from Nuyqua: The rights to dragonball are AT's. AT also has to give permission for someone to use his work. TOEI does not have the rights to dragonball, or else they would not give AT credit for creating dragonball during the credits.

here we go again..AT is only the original creator..he gets credit because it was his idea..however he sold the idea to toei thats why it says copy rights toeianimation.. not copy right to AT.. you obivously don't know what copy right means do you?

QUOTE
Let me take the example again: It is like saying that Isaac Asimov have sold his book "I robot" to the film company that made the movie when the movie was made. He only gave the movie company rights to the movie, not to his whole friggin work to manipulate it as they want to.

again the reason toei made the dragonabll anime because AT sold his idea to toei..his WHOLE IDEA..Ok sir

the only thing AT did not sell is his manga..his original work..thats why there is no DBGT manga..most likely because AT refused that toei make GT manga which will change his original story

.Godo · 10-01-2005

This is useless, you don't get it. *Runs out of topic because of someone having a hard time understanding written words and logical and stated information*

EDIT: Last comment (source: Wikipedia):

Copyright is a set of exclusive rights granted by government for a limited time to regulate the use of a particular form, way or manner in which an idea or information is expressed. Copyright may subsist in a wide range of creative or artistic forms or "works" and subject matter other than works. These include literary works, movies, musical works, sound recordings, paintings, photographs, software, live performancees, television or sound broadcasts and in some jurisdictions industrial designs. Copyright is a type of intellectual property; designs or industrial designs may be a separate or overlapping form of intellectual property in some jurisdictions.

Copyright law only covers the particular form or manner in which ideas or information have been manifested, the "form of material expression". It is not designed or intended to cover the actual idea, concepts, facts, styles or techniques which may be embodied in or represented by the copyright work. Copyright law provides scope for satirical or interpretive works which themselves may be copyright.

For example, the copyright which subsists in relation to a Mickey Mouse cartoon prohibits unauthorised parties from distributing copies of the cartoon or creating derivative works which copy or mimic Disney’s particular talking mouse, but does not prohibit the creation of artistic works about talking mice in general. Other forms of intellectual property may impose legal restrictions where copyright does not.

Goku and company=Toriyama'scharacters=his work=he has the copyright to decide what should happent to his characters.

*Dissapears from this thread*

.Future_Trunks · 10-02-2005

QUOTE(godho @ Oct 1 2005, 08:51 AM)
This is useless, you don't get it. *Runs out of topic because of someone having a hard time understanding written words and logical and stated information*

EDIT: Last comment (source: Wikipedia):

Copyright is a set of exclusive rights granted by government for a limited time to regulate the use of a particular form, way or manner in which an idea or information is expressed. Copyright may subsist in a wide range of creative or artistic forms or "works" and subject matter other than works. These include literary works, movies, musical works, sound recordings, paintings, photographs, software, live performancees, television or sound broadcasts and in some jurisdictions industrial designs. Copyright is a type of intellectual property; designs or industrial designs may be a separate or overlapping form of intellectual property in some jurisdictions.

Copyright law only covers the particular form or manner in which ideas or information have been manifested, the "form of material expression". It is not designed or intended to cover the actual idea, concepts, facts, styles or techniques which may be embodied in or represented by the copyright work. Copyright law provides scope for satirical or interpretive works which themselves may be copyright.

For example, the copyright which subsists in relation to a Mickey Mouse cartoon prohibits unauthorised parties from distributing copies of the cartoon or creating derivative works which copy or mimic Disney’s particular talking mouse, but does not prohibit the creation of artistic works about talking mice in general. Other forms of intellectual property may impose legal restrictions where copyright does not.

Goku and company=Toriyama'scharacters=his work=he has the copyright to decide what should happent to his characters.

*Dissapears from this thread*

[snapback]472094[/snapback]

oh boy..you didn't read a thing of my post did you?..you probably red somthing and yet you didn't understand..

AT=manga only

toei=anime only

i hope that clears somthing to you

**Shirogetsu** · 10-02-2005

Will you two stop arguing!

No there is not going to be another movie.

End. Of. Discussion.

Gohen · 10-02-2005

i think they should make a new movie as i miss fresh DBZ storylines.

.Future_Trunks · 10-02-2005

QUOTE(sailor neptunes lover @ Oct 1 2005, 05:24 PM)
Will you two stop arguing!

No there is not going to be another movie.

End. Of. Discussion.

[snapback]472360[/snapback]

well..in februray 2006 there will be an anniversary movie

The Strike · 10-02-2005

there will? what is it goin to be called

**Shirogetsu** · 10-02-2005

QUOTE(Future_Trunks @ Oct 1 2005, 05:52 PM)
QUOTE(sailor neptunes lover @ Oct 1 2005, 05:24 PM)
Will you two stop arguing!

No there is not going to be another movie.

End. Of. Discussion.

[snapback]472360[/snapback]

well..in februray 2006 there will be an anniversary movie

[snapback]472383[/snapback]

It will probably be crap. =/

O_o another movie, wow.

Lets all hype on how much it will suck.

.Osmond_Fan · 10-02-2005

DBZ is crap enough as it is, it doesn't need another movie...

.Future_Trunks · 10-02-2005

QUOTE(superpoweredgoku @ Oct 1 2005, 05:56 PM)
there will? what is it goin to be called

[snapback]472387[/snapback]

there isn't any info on it right now.. but all i know that they are going to air it in japan februray 2006.

09-30-2005	#16 (permalink)
Gangsta SabZ (23) Final Warrior Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Leeds, UK Posts: 2,614 Rep Power: 8	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? QUOTE(Teen Goten @ Sep 30 2005, 03:12 PM) I hope that if they were going to make another DBZ movie it would take place after DBZ & the begininning of DBGT. [snapback]471681[/snapback] It is very unlikely they'll make another. The only hope is they do it for the anniversary thingie

10-01-2005	#17 (permalink)
Akatsuki_Encore (28) Lord of Worlds Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Norway Posts: 7,321 Rep Power: 11	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? If Toriyama writes the storyline and prevents the story from beeing ruined, I'd say yes, at once.

10-01-2005	#18 (permalink)
.Godo (15) Super Namekian Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 504 Rep Power: 4	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? QUOTE(nyqua @ Sep 29 2005, 09:28 PM) The rights to dragonball are AT's. AT also has to give permission for someone to use his work. TOEI does not have the rights to dragonball, or else they would not give AT credit for creating dragonball during the credits. [snapback]471292[/snapback] Agreed. TOEI has done nothing special with DBZ, they only have animated it, put on some music and made worthless fillers. It is like saying that Isaac Asimov have sold his book "I robot" to the film company that made the movie when the movie was made. He only gave the movie company rights to the movie, not to his whole friggin work. On topic: Yes, but not about DBGT, only DB or DBZ, and if Toriyama want to.

10-01-2005	#19 (permalink)
.Future_Trunks (22) Super Saiyan 3 Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 1,959 Rep Power: 6	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? QUOTE(godho @ Sep 30 2005, 04:18 PM) QUOTE(nyqua @ Sep 29 2005, 09:28 PM) The rights to dragonball are AT's. AT also has to give permission for someone to use his work. TOEI does not have the rights to dragonball, or else they would not give AT credit for creating dragonball during the credits. [snapback]471292[/snapback] Agreed. TOEI has done nothing special with DBZ, they only have animated it, put on some music and made worthless fillers. It is like saying that Isaac Asimov have sold his book "I robot" to the film company that made the movie when the movie was made. He only gave the movie company rights to the movie, not to his whole friggin work. On topic: Yes, but not about DBGT, only DB or DBZ, and if Toriyama want to. [snapback]471704[/snapback] OMFG!?!?!?!? AT does not have the rights to the dragonabll anime he is the original creator and thats that!!! and no.. they don't say the rights belong to AT..they say rights of toeianimation.. however in the manga they do say the rights belong to AT. jeez none of you guys own any dragonball vhs or dvd? look in the back it says rights toeianimation.

10-01-2005	#20 (permalink)
.Godo (15) Super Namekian Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 504 Rep Power: 4	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? Dear, dear Future_Trunks. YOU. DON'T. GET. IT. DO. YOU? READ. THE. F***ING. LINES. THAT. SOME. PEOPLE. ARE. WRITING. OK? For the last time, AKIRA TORIYAMA DECIDES WHAT THAT SOULD HAPPEN TO HIS WORK, HE HAS NOT SOLD IT! Wise words from Nuyqua: The rights to dragonball are AT's. AT also has to give permission for someone to use his work. TOEI does not have the rights to dragonball, or else they would not give AT credit for creating dragonball during the credits. Let me take the example again: It is like saying that Isaac Asimov have sold his book "I robot" to the film company that made the movie when the movie was made. He only gave the movie company rights to the movie, not to his whole friggin work to manipulate it as they want to. How can you not decide what that should be done in something that bases on whole friggin work. The manga=the base of the anime=Toriyama decides. It is HIS original story.

10-01-2005	#21 (permalink)
.Future_Trunks (22) Super Saiyan 3 Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 1,959 Rep Power: 6	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? QUOTE For the last time, AKIRA TORIYAMA DECIDES WHAT THAT SOULD HAPPEN TO HIS WORK, HE HAS NOT SOLD IT! lool.. you see thats the problem right there.. AT did sell his idea thats why he got rich off of it and thats why dragonball turned into an anime.. now the manga was selling greatly in japan..so toei decided to make an anime based on that manga.. AT had nothing to do with the anime..he did not make it..it was this guy... (Daisuke Nishio) daisuke nishio made dragonball, dragonabllZ and DBGT ANIME..AT did not make db/Z/GT ANIME..why you ask? because he SOLD HIS IDEA TO TOEI! QUOTE Wise words from Nuyqua: The rights to dragonball are AT's. AT also has to give permission for someone to use his work. TOEI does not have the rights to dragonball, or else they would not give AT credit for creating dragonball during the credits. here we go again..AT is only the original creator..he gets credit because it was his idea..however he sold the idea to toei thats why it says copy rights toeianimation.. not copy right to AT.. you obivously don't know what copy right means do you? QUOTE Let me take the example again: It is like saying that Isaac Asimov have sold his book "I robot" to the film company that made the movie when the movie was made. He only gave the movie company rights to the movie, not to his whole friggin work to manipulate it as they want to. again the reason toei made the dragonabll anime because AT sold his idea to toei..his WHOLE IDEA..Ok sir the only thing AT did not sell is his manga..his original work..thats why there is no DBGT manga..most likely because AT refused that toei make GT manga which will change his original story

10-01-2005	#22 (permalink)
.Godo (15) Super Namekian Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 504 Rep Power: 4	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? This is useless, you don't get it. Runs out of topic because of someone having a hard time understanding written words and logical and stated information EDIT: Last comment (source: Wikipedia): Copyright is a set of exclusive rights granted by government for a limited time to regulate the use of a particular form, way or manner in which an idea or information is expressed. Copyright may subsist in a wide range of creative or artistic forms or "works" and subject matter other than works. These include literary works, movies, musical works, sound recordings, paintings, photographs, software, live performancees, television or sound broadcasts and in some jurisdictions industrial designs. Copyright is a type of intellectual property; designs or industrial designs may be a separate or overlapping form of intellectual property in some jurisdictions. Copyright law only covers the particular form or manner in which ideas or information have been manifested, the "form of material expression". It is not designed or intended to cover the actual idea, concepts, facts, styles or techniques which may be embodied in or represented by the copyright work. Copyright law provides scope for satirical or interpretive works which themselves may be copyright. For example, the copyright which subsists in relation to a Mickey Mouse cartoon prohibits unauthorised parties from distributing copies of the cartoon or creating derivative works which copy or mimic Disney’s particular talking mouse, but does not prohibit the creation of artistic works about talking mice in general. Other forms of intellectual property may impose legal restrictions where copyright does not. Goku and company=Toriyama'scharacters=his work=he has the copyright to decide what should happent to his characters. Dissapears from this thread

10-02-2005	#23 (permalink)
.Future_Trunks (22) Super Saiyan 3 Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 1,959 Rep Power: 6	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? QUOTE(godho @ Oct 1 2005, 08:51 AM) This is useless, you don't get it. Runs out of topic because of someone having a hard time understanding written words and logical and stated information EDIT: Last comment (source: Wikipedia): Copyright is a set of exclusive rights granted by government for a limited time to regulate the use of a particular form, way or manner in which an idea or information is expressed. Copyright may subsist in a wide range of creative or artistic forms or "works" and subject matter other than works. These include literary works, movies, musical works, sound recordings, paintings, photographs, software, live performancees, television or sound broadcasts and in some jurisdictions industrial designs. Copyright is a type of intellectual property; designs or industrial designs may be a separate or overlapping form of intellectual property in some jurisdictions. Copyright law only covers the particular form or manner in which ideas or information have been manifested, the "form of material expression". It is not designed or intended to cover the actual idea, concepts, facts, styles or techniques which may be embodied in or represented by the copyright work. Copyright law provides scope for satirical or interpretive works which themselves may be copyright. For example, the copyright which subsists in relation to a Mickey Mouse cartoon prohibits unauthorised parties from distributing copies of the cartoon or creating derivative works which copy or mimic Disney’s particular talking mouse, but does not prohibit the creation of artistic works about talking mice in general. Other forms of intellectual property may impose legal restrictions where copyright does not. Goku and company=Toriyama'scharacters=his work=he has the copyright to decide what should happent to his characters. Dissapears from this thread [snapback]472094[/snapback] oh boy..you didn't read a thing of my post did you?..you probably red somthing and yet you didn't understand.. AT=manga only toei=anime only i hope that clears somthing to you

10-02-2005	#24 (permalink)
Shirogetsu I like the eye patch. Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Land of Rain Posts: 8,775 Blog Entries: 13 Rep Power: 162	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? Will you two stop arguing! No there is not going to be another movie. End. Of. Discussion. __________________ NO WAI Turoru no Hibi is coming, you'll see.

10-02-2005	#25 (permalink)
Gohen (18) Artificial Human Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 926 Rep Power: 4	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? i think they should make a new movie as i miss fresh DBZ storylines.

10-02-2005	#26 (permalink)
.Future_Trunks (22) Super Saiyan 3 Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 1,959 Rep Power: 6	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? QUOTE(sailor neptunes lover @ Oct 1 2005, 05:24 PM) Will you two stop arguing! No there is not going to be another movie. End. Of. Discussion. [snapback]472360[/snapback] well..in februray 2006 there will be an anniversary movie

10-02-2005	#27 (permalink)
The Strike (14) Warrior of Namek Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 372 Rep Power: 4	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? there will? what is it goin to be called __________________ apples and potatos make a great combo :p?????????

10-02-2005	#28 (permalink)
Shirogetsu I like the eye patch. Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Land of Rain Posts: 8,775 Blog Entries: 13 Rep Power: 162	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? QUOTE(Future_Trunks @ Oct 1 2005, 05:52 PM) QUOTE(sailor neptunes lover @ Oct 1 2005, 05:24 PM) Will you two stop arguing! No there is not going to be another movie. End. Of. Discussion. [snapback]472360[/snapback] well..in februray 2006 there will be an anniversary movie [snapback]472383[/snapback] It will probably be crap. =/ O_o another movie, wow. Lets all hype on how much it will suck. __________________ NO WAI Turoru no Hibi is coming, you'll see.

10-02-2005	#29 (permalink)
.Osmond_Fan (22) Super Saiyan 3 Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 1,952 Rep Power: 6	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? DBZ is crap enough as it is, it doesn't need another movie...

10-02-2005	#30 (permalink)
.Future_Trunks (22) Super Saiyan 3 Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 1,959 Rep Power: 6	Another Dragon Ball Z movie? QUOTE(superpoweredgoku @ Oct 1 2005, 05:56 PM) there will? what is it goin to be called [snapback]472387[/snapback] there isn't any info on it right now.. but all i know that they are going to air it in japan februray 2006.