MFG 5.1 Anime & Manga Forums - View Single Post - Why the 50 times SSJ multiplier is not impossible

uki1234 · 05-14-2008

I'll use what I have said before:

We see future Gohan training in BASE with SSJ Trunks, with one hand. Gohan just started training with Trunks, so that naturally means that Trunks hasn't used SSJ form before very much, so his multiplier ought to be higher than 20 by your theory, and since Gohan was sparring him with one hand and with not much effort used as we see in manga, he ought to be at least 30 times stronger than Trunks. Now Gohan stated that Trunks would become stronger than him in few months. Point is that something would have to be terribly wrong about this Gohan's statement if Trunks was indeed more than 30 times weaker than Gohan, since its impossible to increase your power more than 30 times in such short time, without stuff like gravity...

This proves that the multiplier cant be 50x in Frieza saga, even by "decreasing theory".

And I dont think that only I think that multiplier is 3x.

05-14-2008	#2 (permalink)
uki1234 (20) Super Saiyan 2 Join Date: May 2008 Location: Belgrade, Serbia Posts: 1,205 Rep Power: 11	Re: Why the 50 times SSJ multiplier is not impossible I'll use what I have said before: We see future Gohan training in BASE with SSJ Trunks, with one hand. Gohan just started training with Trunks, so that naturally means that Trunks hasn't used SSJ form before very much, so his multiplier ought to be higher than 20 by your theory, and since Gohan was sparring him with one hand and with not much effort used as we see in manga, he ought to be at least 30 times stronger than Trunks. Now Gohan stated that Trunks would become stronger than him in few months. Point is that something would have to be terribly wrong about this Gohan's statement if Trunks was indeed more than 30 times weaker than Gohan, since its impossible to increase your power more than 30 times in such short time, without stuff like gravity... This proves that the multiplier cant be 50x in Frieza saga, even by "decreasing theory". And I dont think that only I think that multiplier is 3x.