Quote:
Originally Posted by Island of 1,000 Condiments
I've always held the beliefe that Shodai > Madara.
But, Uchiha fanatics refuse to understand is that all we know is that Shodai defeated Madara. How is not understood. The conditions are not understood. In fact, virtually nothing is known about the battle. However, it is known that Shodai won. Therefore, until more is revealed, Shodai is more powerful. You may suspect the Bijuu were involved. Evidence hints towards it. But does that make it true? No, it doesn't. Until facts are stated, Shodai > Madara.
|
That belief is a fallacy right down to the punctuation. In assuming that, you are assuming a specific scenerio in a sea of probabilities out of which nothing has been confirmed. To assume ANYTHING, using only the premise that there is no evidence to the contrary, is about as wrong as you can get.
@Astner: It's "Tobi", "Obito", and "Shodai", not "Toubi", "Ubito", and "Shondai". Please get it right before you make topics like these.
Also, chakra potential means nothing, as you said, without the right Jutsu to utilize that chakra. Therefore, people like Itachi, who have infinitely less chakra than, say...Kisame...can still be far and away superior because of the Jutsu they use. Also, saying someone's life is similar to someone else's is a comparison of the events and outcomes of those lives, not anything as specific as a person's abilities. Furthermore, Uchiha Sasuke has been compared to Kakashi and Orochimaru as well, not just Madara, and Naruto has even been (briefly) compared to Anko. This just isn't anything to make a convincing argument off of. All I get out of it is that they parallel eachothers' lives. But that's about it.